Open Access Open Badges Protocol

Effect of influenza vaccines against mismatched strains: a systematic review protocol

Andrea C Tricco1, Ayman Chit23, David Hallett4, Charlene Soobiah1, Genevieve Meier6, Maggie Chen1, Mariam Tashkandi5, Chris Bauch7 and Mark Loeb8*

Author Affiliations

1 Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2 GlaxoSmithKline, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

3 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4 Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5 Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6 North America Vaccines Division, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA

7 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

8 McMaster University, Rm. 3203, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Systematic Reviews 2012, 1:35  doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-35

Published: 30 July 2012



Influenza vaccines are most effective when the antigens in the vaccine match those of circulating influenza strains. The extent to which the vaccine is protective when circulating strains differ from vaccine antigens, or are mismatched, is uncertain. We propose to systematically review the cross-protection offered by influenza vaccines against circulating influenza A or B viruses that are not antigenically well-matched to vaccine strains.


This is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting laboratory-confirmed influenza among healthy participants vaccinated with antigens of influenza strains that differed from those circulating will be included. The primary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza (polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or viral culture). The secondary outcome is the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza through antibody assay (a less sensitive test than PCR or viral culture) alone or combined with PCR, and/ or viral culture. The review will be limited to RCTs written in English.

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, previous influenza reviews, and the reference lists of included studies to identify potentially relevant RCTs. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal (using the Cochrane risk of bias tool).

If appropriate, random effects meta-analysis of vaccine efficacy will be conducted in SAS (version 9.2) by calculating the relative risk. Vaccine efficacy will be calculated using the following formula: (1 - relative risk × 100). The results will be analyzed by type of vaccine (live attenuated, trivalent inactivated, or other). Subgroup analysis will include the effects of age (children, adults, older participants), and influenza A versus influenza B on the results. For influenza B we will also consider variable degrees of antigenic mismatch (lineage and drift mismatch).


Our results can be used by researchers and policy-makers to help predict the efficacy of influenza vaccines during mismatched influenza seasons. Furthermore, the review will be of interest to patients and clinicians to determine whether to get immunized or support immunization for a particular influenza season.

Antigenic variation; Cross protection; Influenza A virus; Influenza B virus; Protocol; Systematic review; Vaccines